By the time of the project, Aalto was already a well known public figure in Finland, and this was his mark in the heart of the Finnish civitas. Aalto’s response to the sensitive site, a building with a marble-clad modulor grid facade, has been considered among other things, ironic, cynical, too abstract, commercial, a child’s erector kit, sensitive and poetically severe.
In this study the nature of the polemic is analysed; how Aalto’s architectural style could be praised in one context and criticised in this one. The building is also analysed formally, showing how it fits into the site context and Aalto’s oeuvre, particularly in regard to his response to the city.